BGonline.org Forums

Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?

Posted By: Daniel Murphy
Date: Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 5:41 p.m.

In Response To: Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about? (DC-Ohio)

I got shipped this cube... took it in a heartbeat,

Since ME trailing 9-away 3-away is about 15%, my first reaction would be that it's unlikely that Blue should drop this cube.

But it takes me more than 0.2 seconds to sum up up that 6-3 6-6 3-3 give an immediate direct shot and 5-5 5-2 4-4 an indirect; most numbers don't point or make the bar point and the race isn't hopeless; and phantom acepoint games, if that's what it comes to, win sometimes.

On the other hand, all that musing is something one can do at leisure during the turns preceding this one.

reshipped even faster

Clever boy ;)

Messages In This Thread

• Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
  DC-Ohio -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 4:29 p.m.
  • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
    Stick -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 4:32 p.m.
  • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 5:31 p.m.
    • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
      Chuck Bower -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 9:43 p.m.
      • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 11:25 p.m.
    • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 28 August 2007, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
    Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 5:41 p.m.
  • Rollout and thoughts:
    DC-Ohio -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 11:45 a.m.
    • Rollout and thoughts:
      Keene -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 2:17 p.m.