BGonline.org Forums

Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Monday, 27 August 2007, at 11:25 p.m.

In Response To: Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about? (Chuck Bower)

Takepoint is higher, not equity. I don't particularly know why I looked up the takepoint without an autorecube, really all you need is -3, -9.

I thought this position was slightly better than it is for Blue (around the 82% mark). I guess the diversification of most of Blue's rolls isn't enough to compensate for the horrors of 63 and 66. But yeah, I wouldn't expect to see too many passes here.

Messages In This Thread

• Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
  DC-Ohio -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 4:29 p.m.
  • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
    Stick -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 4:32 p.m.
  • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
    Matt Cohn-Geier -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 5:31 p.m.
    • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
      Chuck Bower -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 9:43 p.m.
      • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
        Matt Cohn-Geier -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 11:25 p.m.
    • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 28 August 2007, at 10:03 p.m.
  • Should this take longer than 0.2s to think about?
    Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 26 August 2007, at 5:41 p.m.
  • Rollout and thoughts:
    DC-Ohio -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 11:45 a.m.
    • Rollout and thoughts:
      Keene -- Monday, 27 August 2007, at 2:17 p.m.