|
BGonline.org Forums
Cube Action After Various Candidate Plays?
Posted By: svilo In Response To: Cube Action After Various Candidate Plays? (Paul Weaver)
Date: Saturday, 31 March 2012, at 5:02 p.m.
I did not make a RO because AtS the margin between the first and second candidate was so large. What I did was Have Roller++ for top candidates at the 4 basic scores. Only AtS was the marin between first two so large. Then it turns out, with so little difference between top 3 at the 4 basic scores
1. It merits RO for the 4 basic scores for the first 2 or 3 moves. 2. It seems like a pivotal position (where the top candidates are close and small changes to the position could change their place). So we can see the importance of various factors.
All 3 top candidates lead to DT positions.
I have 0.05 (5%) GWC error threshold for a blunder. The solution is easy to neglect.
Since the thread is buried deep in the forum already, I can tell I remember someone or two wrote something on gammonvillage about bannana splits. This is something similar but more spectacular.
I will publish these 4-5 rollouts, but I need more time.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.