[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

How to better use XG2 to study

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Thursday, 9 August 2012, at 4:25 p.m.

In Response To: ROLLOUT (alex21)

1) Don't use 1 ply RO for ANYTHING...EVER.

2) Don't use any RO weaker than the selectable 2 ply play/3 ply Red cube..EVER

3) Use nothing less than 3 ply to evaluate candidate plays.

4) Don't use Woolsey MET ..for ANYTHING.

5) Your posted RO has 3 plays which evaluate as considerably better than the winner of the RO. Don't you think that it might be a good idea to also RO those 3 plays?

6) In a rather simple position like this, if a 2 ply play, 3 ply Red cube RO shows the same relative emg's and emg differences as XGR++ and there's a clear winning play, you probably don't need to run a higher level RO.

Here according to XGR++ your weak settings have lucked out as they often will and 22/16 correct. But it is good to be more sure and spening more time than 35 SECONDS so you do a higher level RO and higher level evaluations of candidate plays will make you even more sure and minimize the times when a weak RO setting gives an erronious result.

.. neilkaz ..

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.