BGonline.org Forums
Backgammon is not chess and Nackgammon is not more skillful
Posted By: Bob koca
Date: Saturday, 9 March 2013, at 2:30 a.m.
In Response To: Backgammon is not chess and Nackgammon is not more skillful (Phil Simborg)
At dailygammon I dont think it is true that the field of nack players is stronger and even if so it gets accounted for in Elo.
Messages In This Thread
- Backgammon is not chess!
Joe Russell -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 5:12 a.m.
- Backgammon is not chess!
falafel -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 8:32 a.m.
- Backgammon is not chess!
Giuliano Pietoso -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 11:23 a.m.
- Switch to Nackgammon
Ken Larsen -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 1:34 p.m.
- Backgammon is not chess!
Phil Simborg -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 1:55 p.m.
- Bring back Backgammon-to-lose
Phil Simborg -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 2:21 p.m.
- You want skill?
Stick -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 3:41 p.m.
- Backgammon is not popular!
Chuck Bower -- Friday, 8 March 2013, at 5:57 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.