BGonline.org Forums
Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
Posted By: Karol Szczerek
Date: Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 6:19 a.m.
In Response To: Typical double-aces, nothing to see here (Ian Terry)
Two candidates for me are 4/1 and 3/2 3/1. After the 3/2 3/1 White has more breaching numbers and we keep more priming power but after 4/1 we keep more ways of going forward while he dances as we might escape and cover the 4 in few lucky rolls. I like 3/2 3/1 slightly more but have no idea how to properly weigh these plays with each other.
Messages In This Thread
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
Ian Terry -- Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 5:09 a.m.
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
Karol Szczerek -- Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 6:19 a.m.
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
John Gamalielson -- Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 7:19 a.m.
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
Colin Owen -- Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 4:51 p.m.
- Retro
Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 6:06 p.m.
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 13 November 2018, at 7:20 p.m.
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
Sean Garber -- Wednesday, 14 November 2018, at 7:52 p.m.
- Typical double-aces, nothing to see here
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 15 November 2018, at 1:36 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.