BGonline.org Forums

Neil's Numbers Redux

Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Wednesday, 21 January 2009, at 10:10 p.m.

In Response To: Neil's Numbers Redux (Stick)

By way of John O'Hagan, this is reasonably accurate for Snowie & g11 METs.

 

4    5      6     7    8    9     10  11  12   13   14  15 

7.5  7.5  7   6.5   6   5.5   5    5   4.5   4.5   4    4 

Messages In This Thread

• Neil's Numbers Redux
  Tad Bright -- Wednesday, 21 January 2009, at 9:40 p.m.
  • Neil's Numbers Redux
    Stick -- Wednesday, 21 January 2009, at 9:45 p.m.
    • Neil's Numbers Redux
      Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 21 January 2009, at 10:10 p.m.
      • Neil's Numbers Redux
        Stick -- Wednesday, 21 January 2009, at 10:12 p.m.
        • Neil's Numbers Redux
          Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 1:06 a.m.
          • Neil's Numbers Redux
            John O'Hagan -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 4:37 a.m.
            • Neil's Numbers Redux
              Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 4:51 a.m.
              • Neil's Numbers Redux
                Bob Koca -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 5:00 a.m.
                • Neil's Numbers Redux
                  Bill Riles -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 5:36 a.m.
                  • Neil's Numbers Redux
                    Barry Silliman -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 1:28 p.m.
              • Neil's Numbers Redux
                Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 5:27 p.m.
              • Neil's Numbers Redux
                MFIC -- Thursday, 29 January 2009, at 6:34 a.m.
          • Neil's Numbers Redux
            jdg -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 2:46 p.m.
            • Neil's Numbers Redux
              Tom Keith -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 4:26 p.m.
  • Neil's Numbers Redux
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 22 January 2009, at 11:34 p.m.