|
BGonline.org Forums
Long XG 4 ply RO of opening 41
Posted By: Timothy Chow In Response To: Long XG 4 ply RO of opening 41 (Matt Cohn-Geier)
Date: Wednesday, 9 December 2009, at 3:05 a.m.
MCG wrote:
I believe 51$ is marginally worse than 41$.
You mean in terms of equity lost, compared to splitting? According to Stick's rollouts, GNU agrees with you but Snowie (live cube) doesn't, and I'd be a little surprised if XG does too, given how strongly it seems to prefer 41S to 41$.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.