|
BGonline.org Forums
Naccel 2 -- post #2
Posted By: Lucky Jim In Response To: Naccel 2 -- post #2 (Ian Shaw)
Date: Sunday, 10 January 2010, at 3:30 p.m.
Hi Ian
Think we got the same Naccel count although I suspect you did it a lot faster!
In an earlier post you wrote -
"I experimented with Naccel a few years ago, when I first became aware of it, but I found I was returned to Cluster Counting."
Do you think that you might now switch to using Naccel 2 or have you become sufficiently adept at cluster counting that you don't really need to do so?
Kind regards
Jim
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.