| |
BGonline.org Forums
Quantifying recube vig
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier In Response To: Quantifying recube vig (Timothy Chow)
Date: Tuesday, 12 January 2010, at 4:11 a.m.
Let me restate it this way: Suppose we accept the standard method of measuring takes, i.e., we estimate cubeless wins, factor in adjusted cubeless gammons, and add recube vig. Are you saying that you don't think there's any way to break down recube vig into more easily understandable components, which one might be able to estimate more accurately?
Yeah, that's about right.
If you have not looked into cube efficiency much then your feeling that it is more complicated may be due just to its unfamiliarity rather than its intrinsic complexity.
That is a possibility and is why I pointed it out but I would wager against it.
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.