Naccel 2 -- post #3
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: Naccel 2 -- post #3 (Ian Shaw)
Date: Tuesday, 12 January 2010, at 5:54 p.m.
In Response To: Naccel 2 -- post #3 (Ian Shaw)
That's exactly right, Ian! Nice comparison.
Note that you can count White's formation the same way if you reflect it into the outer board: you would have n0 (still optional) plus n1 n1 n3 n3 n4. This is one of the advantages of having the 0 point be located at the trad 6pt instead of the bearoff tray.
Messages In This Thread
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.