BGonline.org Forums

Kangaroo Count (link)

Posted By: rory
Date: Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 3:02 a.m.

In Response To: Kangaroo Count (link) (Nack Ballard)

I am curious...why would anyone use any method other than a natural count? I am guessing than most open players can count both sides and double check themselves in less than 90 sec. I looked at 5 different positions and averaged 1 min 3 sec. Why is there a need to use a kangaroo count or any other method where all 30 checkers are in play (i.e. no need for an EPC or wastage calculation)?

Messages In This Thread

• Kangaroo Count (link)
  Nack Ballard -- Monday, 18 January 2010, at 9:36 p.m.
  • Kangaroo Count (link)
    rory -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 3:02 a.m.
    • Kangaroo Count (link)
      David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 3:21 a.m.
  • Kangaroo Count (link)
    Matt Ryder -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 4:39 a.m.
    • Kangaroo Count (link)
      Nack Ballard -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 10:51 a.m.