BGonline.org Forums
Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:33 p.m.
In Response To: Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts (Nack Ballard)
When you say 15 checker minimal wastage, what does that imply for lower race counts where it would be optimal to have less than 15 checkers (at a given pip count)? Clearly a pip count will be reached where 15 checkers will no longer make sense.
Messages In This Thread
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 4:30 p.m.
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
KenB -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:43 p.m.
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:54 p.m.
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 6:26 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 8:53 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:15 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 11:47 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:00 a.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:52 a.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:30 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:07 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:18 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:33 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:42 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:43 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 10:13 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 6:49 a.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
rambiz -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 7:37 a.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
David Rockwell -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:20 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Bill Patterson -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Bob Koca -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 4:21 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 5:42 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 3:43 p.m.
- Perspective (on gold standard and N57)
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:56 a.m.
- Can you trust these XG rollouts?
Neil Robins -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 6:33 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.