[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:33 p.m.

In Response To: Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts (Nack Ballard)

When you say 15 checker minimal wastage, what does that imply for lower race counts where it would be optimal to have less than 15 checkers (at a given pip count)? Clearly a pip count will be reached where 15 checkers will no longer make sense.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.