BGonline.org Forums

Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:55 p.m.

In Response To: Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts (neilkaz)

I am of the very strong opinion that pip count oriented race formulas, methods, theories, RO's..etc should be based upon naturally occuring positions with little extra wastage. The key words in Nack 57 or the 10%+2 (adjusted) that I have used for nearly 3 decades are "pip count oriented".

"Sounds" good, but are you saying that you don't agree with us pursuing (extreme) minimal wastage as the standard? And if not, then can you more precisely define what you think we should use, and how can we objectively construct such positions?

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
  Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 4:30 p.m.
  • "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
    KenB -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:43 p.m.
    • "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 7:39 p.m.
  • "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
    David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:54 p.m.
    • "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 11:13 p.m.
  • "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
    Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 6:26 p.m.
  • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 8:53 p.m.
    • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
      Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:15 p.m.
    • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
      Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
      • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
        Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
        • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
          Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 1:51 a.m.
      • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
        Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 11:47 p.m.
        • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
          Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 12:16 a.m.
        • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
          Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 12:32 a.m.
      • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
        Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:00 a.m.
        • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:52 a.m.
          • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
            David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:30 p.m.
            • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
              Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:07 p.m.
              • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:23 p.m.
                • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                  David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:24 p.m.
                • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                  Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:18 p.m.
                  • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                    Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 10:54 p.m.
              • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:40 p.m.
            • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
              Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:18 p.m.
              • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:33 p.m.
                • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                  David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:12 p.m.
                • Number of checkers represented at lower counts
                  Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:38 p.m.
                  • Number of checkers represented at lower counts
                    David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 10:28 p.m.
                  • Number of checkers represented at lower counts
                    Ian Shaw -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
              • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:42 p.m.
                • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                  Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
              • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:43 p.m.
              • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
                Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 10:13 p.m.
            • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
              Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 6:49 a.m.
              • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                rambiz -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 7:37 a.m.
                • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                  mtuhtan -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 7:45 a.m.
                • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                  Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 9:01 a.m.
                • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                  Tom Keith -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 12:57 p.m.
                  • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                    neilkaz -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:33 p.m.
                  • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                    Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 5:32 p.m.
              • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                David Rockwell -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:20 p.m.
              • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                Bill Patterson -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
              • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                Bob Koca -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 4:21 p.m.
                • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                  Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 4:44 p.m.
                  • Link to file
                    Tom Keith -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 5:49 p.m.
                    • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 1 July 2011, at 12:48 a.m.
              • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 5:42 p.m.
                • Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
                  Tom Keith -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 5:59 p.m.
          • Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
            neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 3:43 p.m.
            • Testing subtracting 32 on the low end of pip count range
              neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:20 p.m.
            • 124 vs 138 pips..subtracting 32 is good
              neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:13 p.m.
              • 124 vs 138 pips..subtracting 32 is good
                David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:46 p.m.
                • 124 vs 138 pips..subtracting 32 is good
                  Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:09 p.m.
              • 123 vs 137 probably a bare pass
                neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 6:39 p.m.
                • 123 vs 137 with mid pt contact
                  neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 7:10 p.m.
                  • 123 vs 137 normal looking position
                    neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:12 p.m.
                  • 123 vs 137 with mid pt contact
                    Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:41 p.m.
                    • 123 vs 137 with mid pt contact
                      neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:48 p.m.
            • Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
              neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 3:48 a.m.
              • Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
                Nack Ballard -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 4:40 a.m.
                • Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
                  neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 7:15 p.m.
    • Perspective (on gold standard and N57)
      Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:56 a.m.
      • Perspective (on gold standard and N57)
        jdg -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:54 p.m.
    • Can you trust these XG rollouts?
      Neil Robins -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 6:33 p.m.
      • GNU RO of my 61-69 pip pos is same
        neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 7:35 p.m.
        • GNU RO of my 61-69 pip pos is same
          Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 7:48 p.m.
          • GNU RO of my 61-69 pip pos is same..and
            neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 7:58 p.m.
            • 61-69 no VR
              neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 12:22 a.m.
      • Can you trust these XG rollouts?
        eXtreme Gammon -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:56 p.m.
        • Can you trust these XG rollouts?
          Neil Robins -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
          • Can you trust these XG rollouts?
            neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 12:19 a.m.
          • Can you trust these XG rollouts?
            eXtreme Gammon -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 1:32 a.m.
            • Can you trust these XG rollouts?
              Neil Robins -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 3:05 a.m.