BGonline.org Forums
Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Friday, 5 February 2010, at 7:15 p.m.
In Response To: Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips (Nack Ballard)
On the low end of pips counts, we need to subtract numbers less than 32. Perhaps some formula could be devised to easily tell how much to subtract.
Messages In This Thread
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 4:30 p.m.
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
KenB -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:43 p.m.
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
David Rockwell -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 5:54 p.m.
- "Nack 57" rule -- new race formula (for both traditional and Naccel)
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 6:26 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 8:53 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:15 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:31 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Bob Koca -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 9:55 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Ian Shaw -- Wednesday, 3 February 2010, at 11:47 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Rich Munitz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:00 a.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:52 a.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:30 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:07 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:18 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
David Rockwell -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:33 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:42 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 8:43 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 10:13 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 6:49 a.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
rambiz -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 7:37 a.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
David Rockwell -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:20 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Bill Patterson -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 3:40 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Bob Koca -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 4:21 p.m.
- Ideal Racing Positions - Tables Available
Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 23 June 2011, at 5:42 p.m.
- Very nice, but just a tad conservative for raw pip counts
neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 3:43 p.m.
- Testing subtracting 32 on the low end of pip count range
neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 4:20 p.m.
- 124 vs 138 pips..subtracting 32 is good
neilkaz -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 5:13 p.m.
- Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 3:48 a.m.
- Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 4:40 a.m.
- Extending higher.. 137 vs 152 pips
neilkaz -- Friday, 5 February 2010, at 7:15 p.m.
- Perspective (on gold standard and N57)
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 2:56 a.m.
- Can you trust these XG rollouts?
Neil Robins -- Thursday, 4 February 2010, at 6:33 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.