BGonline.org Forums

Play65 respond

Posted By: Chuck Bower
Date: Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 1:51 p.m.

In Response To: Play65 respond (Ian Dunstan)

My reference to your statement was not meant as a negative criticism of you but was directed at P65/GE, where the aim of all our ire belongs. Sorry if it came out differently.

Messages In This Thread

• Play65 respond
  Ian Dunstan -- Wednesday, 30 May 2007, at 11:43 a.m.
  • Play65 respond
    Stick -- Wednesday, 30 May 2007, at 1:10 p.m.
    • Play65 respond
      Ian Dunstan -- Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 9:06 a.m.
      • Play65 respond
        Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 1:51 p.m.
        • Play65 respond
          Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 2:51 p.m.
          • Play65 respond
            Keene -- Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 3:50 p.m.
        • np :-)
          Ian Dunstan -- Saturday, 2 June 2007, at 7:06 a.m.
          • np :-)
            Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 2 June 2007, at 4:58 p.m.
            • np :-)
              Ian Dunstan -- Sunday, 3 June 2007, at 12:09 a.m.
  • Play65 respond
    neilkaz -- Wednesday, 30 May 2007, at 2:59 p.m.
  • Play65 respond
    Chuck Bower -- Wednesday, 30 May 2007, at 4:32 p.m.
    • Play65 respond
      Achim -- Wednesday, 30 May 2007, at 5:20 p.m.
  • you call that a response?
    garyo -- Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 5:14 p.m.
  • gammonintegrity.com?
    garyo -- Thursday, 31 May 2007, at 5:18 p.m.