BGonline.org Forums
Why X here, but H best after 54S?
Posted By: John O'Hagan
Date: Saturday, 3 April 2010, at 1:53 a.m.
In Response To: Why X here, but H best after 54S? *NM* (neilkaz)
I guess would be splitting with the 6 is less necessary since 54 doesn't put another builder(blot) into the outfield.
Messages In This Thread
- 43S 61 RO
neilkaz -- Friday, 2 April 2010, at 10:09 p.m.
- 43S 61 RO
John O'Hagan -- Friday, 2 April 2010, at 10:40 p.m.
- 43S 61 RO
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 2 April 2010, at 11:05 p.m.
- 43S 61 RO
jdg -- Saturday, 3 April 2010, at 2:36 p.m.
- 43S 61 RO
Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 3 April 2010, at 8:38 p.m.
- 43S 61 RO
Nack Ballard -- Friday, 2 April 2010, at 10:54 p.m.
- similar position - 61 to play
David Rockwell -- Saturday, 3 April 2010, at 12:55 a.m.
- RO
David Rockwell -- Sunday, 4 April 2010, at 12:03 a.m.
- another similar position - 61 to play
David Rockwell -- Saturday, 3 April 2010, at 12:57 a.m.
- RO
David Rockwell -- Saturday, 3 April 2010, at 11:55 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.