|
BGonline.org Forums
65S rule?
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 65S rule? (Tad Bright)
Date: Thursday, 17 June 2010, at 3:26 a.m.
65S... When the 8 needs reinforcement and opponent has builders for 5 or 4?
If you look at my list so far, you'll see that there is already one clear exception: 53P-43Z-65 (diagrammed below). According to Snowie trunc, R (Run, 24/13) is better than S (Split, 24/18 13/8) by .035.
I'm sure there are other exceptions. If you restrict yourself to 31P-xxx-65S and 42P-xxx-65S you'll be closer, but it might be better to wait until more data is compiled before formulating a general rule.
53P-43Z-65 [R S35]
Nack
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.