[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

65S rule?

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Thursday, 17 June 2010, at 3:26 a.m.

In Response To: 65S rule? (Tad Bright)

65S... When the 8 needs reinforcement and opponent has builders for 5 or 4?

If you look at my list so far, you'll see that there is already one clear exception: 53P-43Z-65 (diagrammed below). According to Snowie trunc, R (Run, 24/13) is better than S (Split, 24/18 13/8) by .035.


2O ' ' ' '5X '3X1X ' '5O

1X '2O1X '4O '2O ' ' '4X

53P-43Z-65 [R S35]


I'm sure there are other exceptions. If you restrict yourself to 31P-xxx-65S and 42P-xxx-65S you'll be closer, but it might be better to wait until more data is compiled before formulating a general rule.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.