|
BGonline.org Forums
Crawford backgame - part 2
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: Crawford backgame - part 2 (Ian Dunstan)
Date: Wednesday, 20 June 2007, at 4:43 p.m.
Tough play but still looks like a backgame to me. 24/22 16/13 gets the nod.
Hitting 16/14x/11 is OK, due to decent diversification, but we don't need the extra G's it or 7/2 may win.
Everytime I try something like 7/2 with even 5 men back, it almost never works (not that our game is any good anyhow) 7/2 dupes our 1's and 2's for hitting and advancing as well.
24/22 16/13 hoping to salvage something from the 32 game.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.