[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Crawford backgame - part 2

Posted By: neilkaz
Date: Wednesday, 20 June 2007, at 4:43 p.m.

In Response To: Crawford backgame - part 2 (Ian Dunstan)

Tough play but still looks like a backgame to me. 24/22 16/13 gets the nod.

Hitting 16/14x/11 is OK, due to decent diversification, but we don't need the extra G's it or 7/2 may win.

Everytime I try something like 7/2 with even 5 men back, it almost never works (not that our game is any good anyhow) 7/2 dupes our 1's and 2's for hitting and advancing as well.

24/22 16/13 hoping to salvage something from the 32 game.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.