BGonline.org Forums

Crawford backgame - part 4

Posted By: Ian Dunstan
Date: Sunday, 24 June 2007, at 11:20 a.m.

In Response To: Crawford backgame - part 4 (Daniel Murphy)

Now that I look at 35 again it does look best to leap out and avoid the double hit.

What about 34? b/22* 10/6 could prove awkward if White doesn't find a 5 or 6 next roll. The double hit should be a closer choice now I think.

Messages In This Thread

• Crawford backgame - part 4
  Ian Dunstan -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 2:55 a.m.
  • Crawford backgame - part 4
    Peter G. -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 8:53 a.m.
  • Crawford backgame - part 4
    Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 1:05 p.m.
    • Crawford backgame - part 4
      Ian Dunstan -- Sunday, 24 June 2007, at 11:20 a.m.
  • Crawford backgame - part 4
    neilkaz -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 1:33 p.m.
  • Jumping a 5-prime
    Daniel Murphy -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 3:40 p.m.
    • 5's are wild.
      Chuck Bower -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 10:49 p.m.
      • 5's are wild.
        Bryce -- Monday, 25 June 2007, at 12:13 a.m.
    • Jumping a 5-prime
      Ian Dunstan -- Sunday, 24 June 2007, at 11:42 a.m.
      • Jumping a 5-prime
        Daniel Murphy -- Sunday, 24 June 2007, at 4:22 p.m.
        • Jumping a 5-prime
          Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 24 June 2007, at 11:04 p.m.
  • Crawford backgame - part 4
    Stick -- Saturday, 23 June 2007, at 5:11 p.m.
  • Rollout 2-ply
    Ian Dunstan -- Sunday, 24 June 2007, at 11:13 a.m.