BGonline.org Forums

RO at -5,-7 (original position)

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Wednesday, 12 January 2011, at 4:17 p.m.

In Response To: RO at -5,-7 (original position) (Chuck Bower)

I found these results incredible until I realized that I had the score backwards in my mind (-7,-5 instead of -5,-7). LOL. Taking is far more believable now, though I still would have dropped for money.

I'll have to study Stanley's theory more closely.

Messages In This Thread

• matchplay cube decisions
  Chuck Bower -- Sunday, 9 January 2011, at 5:54 p.m.
  • matchplay cube decisions
    Stanley E. Richards -- Sunday, 9 January 2011, at 9:39 p.m.
    • matchplay cube decisions
      Timothy Chow -- Monday, 10 January 2011, at 4:56 p.m.
      • matchplay cube decisions
        Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 10 January 2011, at 5:09 p.m.
        • matchplay cube decisions
          Timothy Chow -- Monday, 10 January 2011, at 5:25 p.m.
          • alternate score RO's in progress *NM*
            Chuck Bower -- Monday, 10 January 2011, at 6:12 p.m.
  • RO at -5,-7 (original position)
    Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 11 January 2011, at 2:02 a.m.
    • RO at -4,-7
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 11 January 2011, at 2:04 a.m.
      • RO at -6,-7
        Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 11 January 2011, at 2:06 a.m.
        • RO at $-play
          Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 11 January 2011, at 2:09 a.m.
    • RO at -5,-7 (original position)
      Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 12 January 2011, at 4:17 p.m.
  • 3 ply for 5 away theory discussion
    Stanley E. Richards -- Tuesday, 11 January 2011, at 5:18 a.m.
    • 3 ply for 5 away theory discussion
      Chuck Bower -- Tuesday, 11 January 2011, at 6:15 p.m.
  • Better Example of 5 Away Lower Take Point
    Stanley E. Richards -- Wednesday, 12 January 2011, at 5:53 a.m.
    • Another Example of 5 Away Lower Take Point
      Stanley E. Richards -- Wednesday, 12 January 2011, at 5:58 a.m.