|
BGonline.org Forums
Why use Nactation?
Posted By: leobueno In Response To: How to nactate 52S-54-g 13/9 8/3* (Philip Cherrington)
Date: Sunday, 16 January 2011, at 4:49 p.m.
When I first began reading about backgammon, the conventional notation seemed fairly intuitive. I see that in this forum several folk use Nactation instead.
I started to try to figure out Nactation but that got me thinking: Given the accepted and widespread use of conventional notation, why does the game need a new notation system?
I realize Nactation is more economical, however, it does not feel very intuitive (this of course may just be a case of an old dog learning a new trick). Also, as the original subject of this thread indicates, Nactation appers to engender some notational ambiguity. Since the old approach is good as it is, why use a new one?
By the way, I am sure that I speak for everyone in the forum when I express my gratitute to Nack for his ongoing contributions. I hope he accepts the spirit of this post, which in no way is intended to antagonize or criticize Nack for promulgating and advocating the use of Nactation.
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.