|
BGonline.org Forums
Nack58 and Trice62
Posted By: christian munk-christensen In Response To: Nack58 and Trice62 (Nack Ballard)
Date: Monday, 31 January 2011, at 10:31 p.m.
I will follow your advice and lose the 8-9-12. I will also lose Trice 62 because Nack 58 is simple and elegant and you claim it is more accurate.
Is Nack 58 an improvement of Nack 57?
Or is Nack 58 used in certain length races and Nack 57 in certain length races? (this has probably been discussed earlier but I couldn't find it)
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.