BGonline.org Forums

Data for 62S-41, 63S-41, 64S-41

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 7:12 p.m.

In Response To: XG 4 ply RO finished (neilkaz)

A wise man once said that after a mediocre hitting roll like 41, responder is at a clear disadvantage.

Here is money data for the three 6xS-41 positions:

62S-41
Snowie .. [X H4] 10k
GnuBG .. [H X15] 15k .. d[H X7] 15k
XG 3-ply [H X6] 62k
XG 4-ply ???

63S-41
Snowie .. [X H3] 10k
GnuBG .. [H X9] 15k .. d[H X3] 5k
XG 3-ply [H=X] 62k
XG 4-ply [H X1] 46k

64S-41
Snowie .. [X H14] 20k
GnuBG .. [X H4] 46k .. d[X H4] 15k, g[H X11] 15k
XG 3-ply [X H11] 31k
XG 4-ply [X H9] 15k

XG's margins for this set are between Snowie's and Gnu's, and so far XG 4-ply agrees with XG 3-ply. It is therefore not hard to predict that Neil's 4-ply 62S-41 rollout will have H (hit-and-down) beating X (hit-and-split) by .007 or so, though we'll see.

To the right of Gnu's money results I've also included data for DMP ("d" before the bracket) and GG ("g"), though some of Gnu's H bias may carry over.

I'm still waiting to get back my 62S-41 and 63S-41 Snowie extensions to 20k.

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• 63S-41 might be TCTC
  neilkaz -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 12:22 a.m.
  • 63S-41 At Match Scores
    Paul Weaver -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 1:20 a.m.
    • 63S-41 At Match Scores
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 2:00 a.m.
    • 63S-41 At Match Scores
      Stick -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 2:20 a.m.
      • 63S-41 At Match Scores
        Bob Koca -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 3:20 a.m.
  • XG 4 ply RO finished
    neilkaz -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 3:12 p.m.
    • Data for 62S-41, 63S-41, 64S-41
      Nack Ballard -- Sunday, 21 March 2010, at 7:12 p.m.