BGonline.org Forums
Now with six-point prime, please :)
Posted By: Matt Cohn-Geier
Date: Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 6:22 p.m.
In Response To: Now with six-point prime, please :) (Timothy Chow)
I really thought it was a great rule and should have caught on, but she disagreed. So did all her friends. I have an idea for a variation of the Holland rule that I think has greater promise.
Messages In This Thread
- Fifteen checkers on the bar, fewest moves
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 2:35 a.m.
- Fifteen checkers on the bar, fewest moves
Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 3:51 a.m.
- Fifteen checkers on the bar, fewest moves
Michael Nielsen -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 5:06 p.m.
- 7 rolls
Michael Nielsen -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 6:19 p.m.
- 7 moves of course *NM*
Michael Nielsen -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 6:27 p.m.
- 7 rolls
Ray Kershaw -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 7:37 p.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 12:32 a.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 12:34 a.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 1:00 a.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Daniel Murphy -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 1:25 a.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 1:25 p.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 3:30 p.m.
- Now with six-point prime, please :)
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 6:22 p.m.
- Mind-boggling puzzles
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 10 June 2010, at 5:25 a.m.
- Fifteen checkers on the bar, fewest moves
Keene -- Wednesday, 9 June 2010, at 6:35 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.