BGonline.org Forums

Insignificant Correction: 21$-21 Data

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Thursday, 15 September 2011, at 6:12 a.m.

In Response To: 21$-21 (Nack Ballard)

Insignificant Correction: $21-21 Data In trying to match the posts containing rollouts and nacbracs of opening sequences, I have found occassional, insignificant errors. I am taking the time to post the corrections, however, in case someone comes after me, trying to do the same thing. Correction: In Nack's post here, there are two minor errors. The XG 3-ply rollout reported as XG 3-ply [$ S12] 15k was evidentally made by Stick. Stick posted it here. The number of trials was only 5k, as you can see in Stick's post. Nack mentions the same thing is his post here. The XG 2-ply rollout reported as XG 2-ply [$ S9] 4k so far was actually Neil's 4-ply rollout. You can see his partial result posted here. Neil posted the actual rollout here, where you see that it is a 4-ply rollout. (Neil mistakenly titled his post 21S 21 after 11k, something he noted here. Mike

Messages In This Thread

• 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
  neilkaz -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 12:22 a.m.
  • 21$-21
    David Rockwell -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 2:51 p.m.
    • 21$-21 after about 4500
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 3:54 p.m.
    • 21$-21
      Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 20 January 2010, at 4:54 a.m.
      • Insignificant Correction: 21$-21 Data
        Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 15 September 2011, at 6:12 a.m.
  • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
    Andreas -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 5:51 p.m.
  • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
    Keene -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 6:05 p.m.
    • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
      neilkaz -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 6:13 p.m.
      • 21$ 62 XG 4 ply RO results
        Keene -- Tuesday, 19 January 2010, at 8:20 p.m.