|
BGonline.org Forums
52D-54D-21$-31 and variant
Posted By: Nack Ballard In Response To: 31 to play (Casper van der Tak)
Date: Thursday, 3 November 2011, at 8:54 p.m.
Sounds good, but IMO those variations don't really deserve the spotlight. White will be hitting back much of the time.
52D-54D-21$-31
52D-54D-51$-31
Consider the main position on the left (52D-54D-21$-31) and its variant on the right. Granted, there is a 3-pip degradation in White's priming battle chances (further raising Blue's incentive to play P); even so, if P's edge over H is not clearly smaller (if smaller at all) in the right-hand position, it seems reasonable to conclude that White's offsetting aspect of having only one checker instead of two on the 11pt is not a substantial factor. (If you're curious, feel free to roll it out or ask me and I will.)
Nack
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.