I never would have found or made the play recommended by XG+. Are there any readers who would have played 18/16 18/14?
I am sure I could make up some BS explanation to justify 18/16 18/14, but then, imagine how silly I would feel if a rollout showed it to be wrong.
| | White is Konrad
score: 0 pip: 135 | 15 point match | pip: 161 score: 9
Blue is Falafel | |
XGID=-aaB-BBB----bB-A-cBe-Bba--:0:0:1:42:9:0:0:15:10 |
Blue to play 42 |
1. | XG Roller+ | 18/16 18/14 | eq: +0.268 |
| Player: Opponent: | 62.07% (G:17.65% B:0.92%) 37.93% (G:11.91% B:0.33%) | |
|
2. | XG Roller+ | 13/11 13/9 | eq: +0.236 (-0.031) |
| Player: Opponent: | 60.61% (G:17.89% B:0.79%) 39.39% (G:12.06% B:0.34%) | |
|
3. | XG Roller+ | 15/11 13/11 | eq: +0.229 (-0.039) |
| Player: Opponent: | 60.26% (G:17.35% B:0.76%) 39.74% (G:11.78% B:0.31%) | |
|
4. | XG Roller+ | 15/9 | eq: +0.225 (-0.043) |
| Player: Opponent: | 60.19% (G:17.05% B:0.73%) 39.81% (G:11.56% B:0.29%) | |
|
5. | XG Roller+ | 18/14 15/13 | eq: +0.195 (-0.073) |
| Player: Opponent: | 59.83% (G:16.44% B:0.76%) 40.17% (G:12.31% B:0.30%) | |
|
6. | XG Roller+ | 13/7 | eq: +0.194 (-0.074) |
| Player: Opponent: | 59.33% (G:17.81% B:0.80%) 40.67% (G:12.01% B:0.31%) | |
|
eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.00, MET: eXtremeGammon