BGonline.org Forums

63S-32 — What order is best for plays in a nacbrac?

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Friday, 30 December 2011, at 10:04 p.m.

63S-32 Position ID: 4HPiQSDgc/ABMA Match ID: cAkNAAAAAAAA Nack posted nacbracs for a Snowie rollout of 63S-32 in two separate posts: Nacbrac #1: [W Z3 U4 S7 T24 H27 $29 536] 31k 25kH 27k$ 15k Nacbrac #2: [W Z3 U4 S7 H27 $29 T24 %36] ~31***27 25*15 Both nacbracs report the same results, but with slightly different trials counts: Play Nacbrac #1 Nacbrac #2 W 31k 31k Z 31k 31k U 31k 31k S 31k 31k T 31k 25k H 25k 27k $ 27k 25k % 15k 15k Furthermore, in Nacbrac #2, T24 is positioned after both H27 and $29. By this placement, T gets only 25k trials. Three questions: Is there a link to the original Snowie rollout? What are the correct trial counts? Is it acceptable to list moves out of order in a nacbrac? In particular, can T24 be listed after H27 and $29? Thanks. Mike

Messages In This Thread

• 63S-32 — What order is best for plays in a nacbrac?
  Taper_Mike -- Friday, 30 December 2011, at 10:04 p.m.
  • 63S-32 — What order is best for plays in a nacbrac?
    Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 31 December 2011, at 12:34 a.m.
    • 63S-32 — What order is best for plays in a nacbrac?
      Taper_Mike -- Saturday, 31 December 2011, at 12:57 a.m.