|
BGonline.org Forums
63S-32 — What order is best for plays in a nacbrac?
Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Friday, 30 December 2011, at 10:04 p.m.
63S-32 Position ID: 4HPiQSDgc/ABMA Match ID: cAkNAAAAAAAA Nack posted nacbracs for a Snowie rollout of 63S-32 in two separate posts:
Both nacbracs report the same results, but with slightly different trials counts:
- Nacbrac #1: [W Z3 U4 S7 T24 H27 $29 536] 31k 25kH 27k$ 15k
- Nacbrac #2: [W Z3 U4 S7 H27 $29 T24 %36] ~31***27 25*15
Play Nacbrac #1 Nacbrac #2 W 31k 31k Z 31k 31k U 31k 31k S 31k 31k T 31k 25k H 25k 27k $ 27k 25k % 15k 15k Furthermore, in Nacbrac #2, T24 is positioned after both H27 and $29. By this placement, T gets only 25k trials.
Three questions:
Thanks.
- Is there a link to the original Snowie rollout?
- What are the correct trial counts?
- Is it acceptable to list moves out of order in a nacbrac? In particular, can T24 be listed after H27 and $29?
Mike
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.