BGonline.org Forums

3 for 3(1)

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Friday, 6 January 2012, at 2:59 a.m.

In Response To: 3 for 3(1) (DanielP)

Hitting looks like the weakest option. I'm guessing the other two plays are close but I would anchor. Making the 5pt equalizes primes but we have two checkers behind the prime so we're still losing. When defending, make defensive plays.

Messages In This Thread

• 3 for 3(1)
  DanielP -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 12:15 p.m.
  • 3 for 3(1)
    Seth -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 1:22 p.m.
  • 3 for 3(1)
    pontiac -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 1:27 p.m.
  • 3 for 3(1)
    Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 5 January 2012, at 2:29 p.m.
  • 3 for 3(1)
    Timothy Chow -- Friday, 6 January 2012, at 2:59 a.m.