BGonline.org Forums
Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Posted By: Fabrice Liardet
Date: Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 9:39 a.m.
In Response To: Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play? (Bill Riles)
I agree. Players have a duty to play because it is what backgammon tournaments are for. The early draws are a major problem in drawing interest to chess tournaments and it would be nice if backgammon could stay away from that plague.
Messages In This Thread
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Bill Riles -- Monday, 9 January 2012, at 10:57 p.m.
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Timothy Chow -- Monday, 9 January 2012, at 11:03 p.m.
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Casper van der Tak -- Monday, 9 January 2012, at 11:26 p.m.
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Strato -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 1:14 a.m.
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Steve Mellen -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 2:03 a.m.
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 7:28 a.m.
- Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Fabrice Liardet -- Tuesday, 10 January 2012, at 9:39 a.m.
- The Truth About What Took Place - Should Major Tournament Events be Allowed to be 'Resolved' by Agreement Rather than by Play?
Alan Grunwald -- Wednesday, 11 January 2012, at 12:59 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.