BGonline.org Forums
Perhaps You Should Consider Parcheesi
Posted By: higonefive
Date: Tuesday, 24 January 2012, at 6:10 p.m.
In Response To: Perhaps You Should Consider Parcheesi (Paul Weaver)
How about the probabilities in a four-handed Mensch-ärgere-dich-nicht match? Isn't also not so easy...
Messages In This Thread
- What would you play? and why :)
Christian Sorensen -- Tuesday, 24 January 2012, at 11:18 a.m.
- What would you play? and why :)
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 24 January 2012, at 11:24 a.m.
- What would you play? and why :)
Michael Depreli -- Tuesday, 24 January 2012, at 12:51 p.m.
- What would you play? and why :)
pontiac -- Tuesday, 24 January 2012, at 4:38 p.m.
- 43D 64R 52?
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 24 January 2012, at 7:01 p.m.
- xxP-43D-64R-52, four positions
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 4:49 a.m.
- xxP-43D-64R-52, four positions
Daniel Murphy -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 6:56 a.m.
- 64P-43D-64R-52, rollout
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 10:01 p.m.
- 53P-43D-64R-52, rollout
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 10:41 p.m.
- 42P-43D-64R-52, rollout
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 11:42 p.m.
- 31P-43D-64R-52, rollout
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 January 2012, at 5:05 a.m.
- ( xxP)-43D-64R-52, summary of five positions
Nack Ballard -- Thursday, 26 January 2012, at 6:04 a.m.
- 43D 64R 52?
Nack Ballard -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 4:54 a.m.
- What would you play? and why :)
Turz -- Wednesday, 25 January 2012, at 10:13 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.