BGonline.org Forums

Ghosts in the Analysis: How Common is it to reject the Best Play for a Blunder?

Posted By: Mr Majestyk
Date: Thursday, 1 March 2012, at 12:48 a.m.

Example: Here, in Michael's 33 position, I instinctively played 21/9 but unsettled on playing 21/15 6/3*(2). Something not so obvious went wrong in the analysis! The implications, here, are far and wide...but what do you think??

NBM

		White is Player 2 score: 0 pip: 129 7 point match pip: 155 score: 0 Blue is Player 1
XGID=---aBBBAB-b--Cc--b-c-Cbb--:0:0:1:33:0:0:0:7:10
Blue to play 33

eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.02

Messages In This Thread

• Ghosts in the Analysis: How Common is it to reject the Best Play for a Blunder?
  Mr Majestyk -- Thursday, 1 March 2012, at 12:48 a.m.
  • Ghosts in the Analysis: How Common is it to reject the Best Play for a Blunder?
    Michael Depreli -- Thursday, 1 March 2012, at 7:20 a.m.
    • Ghosts in the Analysis: How Common is it to reject the Best Play for a Blunder?
      Mr Majestyk -- Thursday, 1 March 2012, at 9:49 a.m.
      • Ghosts in the Analysis: How Common is it to reject the Best Play for a Blunder?
        Casper van der Tak -- Thursday, 1 March 2012, at 10:01 a.m.
        • Ghosts in the Analysis: How Common is it to reject the Best Play for a Blunder?
          Mr Majestyk -- Thursday, 1 March 2012, at 12:24 p.m.