BGonline.org Forums

Typo correction

Posted By: Nack Ballard
Date: Monday, 9 April 2012, at 2:05 a.m.

In Response To: Nacbracs for Cube Actions (Nack Ballard)

My third paragraph previous to the diagrams should have read:

"N for no double (or X for no redouble) is used for both situations. When the (absolute) equity is LESS than 1000 (meaning 1.000), you know the position is not good enough. When the equity is greater than 1000, you know the position is too good."

(I had mistyped "greater" where "LESS" now appears.)

Nack

Messages In This Thread

• Nacbracs for Cube Actions?
  Taper_Mike -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 3:47 a.m.
  • Nacbracs for Cube Actions?
    Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 4:26 a.m.
    • Nacbracs for Cube Actions?
      Taper_Mike -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 5:08 a.m.
      • Ditto on Ohio and the strong play! *NM*
        Casper van der Tak -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 8:25 a.m.
      • Nacbracs for Cube Actions?
        Dmitriy Obukhov -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 10:28 p.m.
      • Nacbracs for Cube Actions
        Nack Ballard -- Saturday, 7 April 2012, at 4:25 p.m.
        • Cube Actions after 61P-32Z-55A
          Taper_Mike -- Sunday, 8 April 2012, at 11:43 p.m.
        • Typo correction
          Nack Ballard -- Monday, 9 April 2012, at 2:05 a.m.
  • Link to Nack's Explanations
    Taper_Mike -- Friday, 30 March 2012, at 11:56 p.m.
  • Nacbracs for Cube Actions — Summary
    Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 31 May 2012, at 12:32 a.m.
    • Are your links as intended? *NM*
      Nack Ballard -- Friday, 1 June 2012, at 12:16 a.m.
    • Nacbracs for Cube Actions — Updated Summary
      Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 18 February 2014, at 9:45 p.m.