BGonline.org Forums
11 to play
Posted By: Snua
Date: Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 3:21 p.m.
In Response To: 11 to play (Christian Munk-Christensen)
Of course 9/7 (2) is far too obvious which means that making the 5 is right. Ex post facto justifications: white's ace point blot and our straggler on the 23. Getting hit leaves some returns and the importance of our man on the 23 is that we really need him to make our prime. As he's not in the area, it makes the priming play less attractive. Something like that anyway.
Messages In This Thread
- 11 to play
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 9:58 a.m.
- 11 to play
Christian Munk-Christensen -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 10:54 a.m.
- 11 to play
Casper van der Tak -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 11:46 a.m.
- 11 to play
John Gamalielson -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 5:17 p.m.
- 11 to play
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 8:13 p.m.
- 11 to play
neilkaz -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 8:17 p.m.
- 11 to play
John Gamalielson -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 8:47 p.m.
- 11 to play
Timothy Chow -- Wednesday, 2 May 2012, at 8:34 p.m.
- 11 to play
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 8:29 p.m.
- 11 to play
Stick -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 8:35 p.m.
- 11 to play
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 10:32 p.m.
- 11 to play
neilkaz -- Wednesday, 2 May 2012, at 5:10 p.m.
- 11 to play
Snua -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 3:21 p.m.
- 11 to play
Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 7:07 p.m.
- 11 to play
ah_clem -- Tuesday, 1 May 2012, at 4:34 p.m.
- 11 to play Rollout
Matt Cohn-Geier -- Wednesday, 2 May 2012, at 5:24 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.