| |
BGonline.org Forums
a better way to pick the giants(assuming the giants are the best)
Posted By: christian munk-christensen In Response To: a better way to pick the giants(assuming the giants are the best) (David Wells)
Date: Friday, 1 June 2012, at 8:51 p.m.
I like your challenge. It oozes supreme confidence. I believe your game plenty justifies the confidence. Knowing a bit about your game, I'll say you'd be a big favourite to win some money if you were to play all the giants for the same stakes in the same number of games per giant. The way I see it you'll be evenly matches against a very few giants, you'll be a favourite against some, and you'll be a big favourite against probably half the giants.
For me the Giants list should be about voting for those players who you "fear" the most as a player. In other words who would you least like to play for high stakes.
If noone accepts your challenge, then I think that speaks volumes about the respect the giants have for your game. And thus you ought to be placed a lot higher on the list than you currently are, IMO.
I hope you will get some takes! :-)
| |
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.