[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

statistical significance

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 26 June 2012, at 5:03 p.m.

In Response To: statistical significance (Bill Phipps)

As I mentioned recently, Iancho reports that Stick's lower and upper quartiles are 1.19 and 2.64 respectively.

It's a bit misleading to talk about "statistical significance" in this context, by the way. Strictly speaking, that term should only be used when a hypothesis is made at the outset and some experiments are performed to test the hypothesis. Looking retrospectively at results that have already been obtained and claiming "statistical significance" is always a scientifically suspect procedure.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.