BGonline.org Forums

Wish I had Nack's nack for retro analysis

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 12:28 a.m.

In Response To: NQDQ: tricky 65 (leobueno)

–

GNUbg 149 leobueno 143 Position ID: Zh7wATDg28HBAA Match ID: cAkXAAAAAAAE This looks like a 5th or 6th roll position, but I can’t come close to figuring it out. The one thing I will state flatly is that no-well played sequence would have Blue moving just once (with a 66) to arrive at this position. Do you recall how you got here? Mike

Messages In This Thread

• NQDQ: tricky 65
  leobueno -- Sunday, 9 December 2012, at 11:24 p.m.
  • NQDQ: tricky 65
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 10 December 2012, at 4:00 a.m.
  • NQDQ: tricky 65 - RO
    smcrtorchs -- Tuesday, 11 December 2012, at 2:02 p.m.
  • NQDQ: tricky 65 ** RO *** partial but steady
    leobueno -- Thursday, 13 December 2012, at 12:31 p.m.
  • Wish I had Nack's nack for retro analysis
    Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 12:28 a.m.
    • Wish I had Nack's nack for retro analysis
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 12:57 a.m.
      • 42P-66B-66A-65
        Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 2:06 a.m.
        • 42P-66B-66-65 – Correcting Nactation
          Taper_Mike -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 1:31 a.m.