BGonline.org Forums

42P-66B-66A-65

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 2:06 a.m.

In Response To: Wish I had Nack's nack for retro analysis (Timothy Chow)

–

42P-66B-66A-65 Position ID: Zh7wATDg28HBAA Match ID: cAkXAAAAAAAE Taper_Mike: The one thing I will state flatly is that no-well played sequence would have Blue moving just once (with a 66) to arrive at this position. I guess you all know how much I know. Thanks, Timothy. Mike

Messages In This Thread

• NQDQ: tricky 65
  leobueno -- Sunday, 9 December 2012, at 11:24 p.m.
  • NQDQ: tricky 65
    Timothy Chow -- Monday, 10 December 2012, at 4:00 a.m.
  • NQDQ: tricky 65 - RO
    smcrtorchs -- Tuesday, 11 December 2012, at 2:02 p.m.
  • NQDQ: tricky 65 ** RO *** partial but steady
    leobueno -- Thursday, 13 December 2012, at 12:31 p.m.
  • Wish I had Nack's nack for retro analysis
    Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 12:28 a.m.
    • Wish I had Nack's nack for retro analysis
      Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 12:57 a.m.
      • 42P-66B-66A-65
        Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 18 December 2012, at 2:06 a.m.
        • 42P-66B-66-65 – Correcting Nactation
          Taper_Mike -- Monday, 27 October 2014, at 1:31 a.m.