BGonline.org Forums

why is this a double?

Posted By: Timothy Chow
Date: Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 1:34 p.m.

In Response To: why is this a double? (John O'Hagan)

JOH wrote:

OTOH, anyone who would play 24/18 24/21 with a 63 in response to 64P ATS can't be too good

This strikes me as a risky iocane powder strategy. Perhaps the opponent played 24/18 24/21, knowing that he or she would get back some of the equity immediately because DanielP wouldn't know enough to double ATS, and also as a hustling technique.

Messages In This Thread

• why is this a double?
  DanielP -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 11:34 a.m.
  • why is this a double?
    John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 12:39 p.m.
    • why is this a double?
      John O'Hagan -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 12:50 p.m.
      • why is this a double?
        Timothy Chow -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 1:34 p.m.
        • I agree with MCG
          Stick -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 4:26 p.m.
      • why is this a double?
        Smcrtorchs -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 7:56 p.m.
  • why is this a double?
    ah_clem -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 5:27 p.m.
  • why is this a double?
    neilkaz -- Tuesday, 26 March 2013, at 6:51 p.m.
  • why is this a double?
    Keene -- Friday, 29 March 2013, at 5:28 p.m.