BGonline.org Forums

2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy

Posted By: Bob Koca
Date: Thursday, 4 April 2013, at 10:57 p.m.

In Response To: 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy (rambiz)

You are including a factor in his play which shows that theoretical play is not called for. But there are many other factors. How his is checker play? What about his taking tendencies?

Messages In This Thread

• 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
  leobueno -- Thursday, 4 April 2013, at 9:54 p.m.
  • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
    rambiz -- Thursday, 4 April 2013, at 10:41 p.m.
    • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
      Bob Koca -- Thursday, 4 April 2013, at 10:57 p.m.
      • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
        rambiz -- Friday, 5 April 2013, at 3:05 p.m.
    • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
      Joe Russell -- Friday, 5 April 2013, at 6:24 a.m.
      • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
        Chuck Bower -- Friday, 5 April 2013, at 11:46 p.m.
  • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
    Phil Simborg -- Friday, 5 April 2013, at 1:50 a.m.
  • 2-away 2-away when opponent does not know automatic double strategy
    ah_clem -- Sunday, 7 April 2013, at 11:45 p.m.