[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Proposal to redefine suffix -n in a move sequence

Posted By: David Rockwell
Date: Friday, 3 May 2013, at 12:27 p.m.

In Response To: Proposal to redefine suffix -n in a move sequence (mtuhtan)

Consistent with the post above, I would use j for no-Jacoby. That frees n for NMS.

If you ever find a position where XG cubes and XG beavers its own double, I'd like to see it.

I am not a fan of using NMS for rollouts since it is not well defined and you will sometimes find differences in results between different scores. But, if you want to do it, it makes sense to have a term to use.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.