BGonline.org Forums

Cube PR Vs. Checker PR

Posted By: Joe Russell
Date: Saturday, 4 May 2013, at 9:06 p.m.

In Response To: Cube PR Vs. Checker PR (Phil Simborg)

While cube errors are no less costly than checker play errors of an equal size on a purely theoretical standpoint, I do believe that there is often a difference in the practical cost. I think what you might be saying is you believe there is a difference between an effective PR and a theoretical PR.

Messages In This Thread

• Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
  Phil Simborg -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 2:52 p.m.
  • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
    neilkaz -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:16 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:50 p.m.
      • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
        Bob Koca -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 6:25 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      ah_clem -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:55 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      David Rockwell -- Friday, 3 May 2013, at 1:00 a.m.
  • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
    rew -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 3:41 p.m.
  • Rating of bot that didn't cube
    Rod -- Thursday, 2 May 2013, at 5:25 p.m.
  • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
    Joe Russell -- Saturday, 4 May 2013, at 9:06 p.m.
    • Cube PR Vs. Checker PR
      Timothy Chow -- Sunday, 5 May 2013, at 4:10 a.m.