BGonline.org Forums
To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Posted By: ah_clem
Date: Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 2:14 a.m.
In Response To: To P or not to P, where P stands for... (Chuck Bower)
Are there any other serious candidates besides 24/16 and 4(2)?
Pottle or Point?
I think that's what Tim was getting at with the title.
Messages In This Thread
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Timothy Chow -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 1:44 a.m.
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Chuck Bower -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 2:00 a.m.
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
ah_clem -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 2:14 a.m.
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
ah_clem -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 2:01 a.m.
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Dmitriy Obukhov -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 4:03 a.m.
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Taper_Mike -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 5:40 a.m.
- Actually, it's more of a guideline than a law
Sam Pottle -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 8:54 a.m.
- To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Chase -- Thursday, 16 May 2013, at 5:27 p.m.
- Rollout: To P or not to P, where P stands for...
Timothy Chow -- Friday, 17 May 2013, at 2:43 p.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.