BGonline.org Forums
An argument for touch move?
Posted By: Ken Larsen
Date: Wednesday, 19 June 2013, at 7:14 p.m.
In Response To: An argument for touch move? (Daniel Murphy)
In other words, Phil and Ed had better hope Phil's rules aren't adopted. They might be in a lot of trouble. :-)
Messages In This Thread
- An argument for touch move?
Bob Koca -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 5:43 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
Jason Lee -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 5:52 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
storm -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 6:20 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
Phil Simborg -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 6:21 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
Mr Majestyk -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 6:40 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
Sam Pottle -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 8:21 p.m.
- An argument for touch move? (long)
mamabear -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 8:25 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
Taper_Mike -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 9:47 p.m.
- An argument for touch move?
Daniel Murphy -- Tuesday, 18 June 2013, at 10:53 p.m.
- Backgammon is not chess
Taper_Mike -- Wednesday, 19 June 2013, at 1:21 a.m.
- An argument for touch move?
TarHeelFan -- Wednesday, 19 June 2013, at 4:37 a.m.
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.