[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Nactations of 64S-21H-51 — Late correction

Posted By: Taper_Mike
Date: Tuesday, 25 June 2013, at 12:55 a.m.

In Response To: Nactations of 64S-21H-51 (Taper_Mike)

Near the end of preceding post, where Nactations in the Z (Reverse split) family are described in the last row of the table, I mistakenly referred to the Z family being empty. I meant to say S. The correction is below:

By the Convenience Clause, when the S (Split) family is empty, S may be used in lieu of Z, and is preferred in most contexts.

You may enjoy reviewing this very interesting position. Here is Tim’s original post. I have a new rollout underway.

Mike

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response
Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:
 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.