|
BGonline.org Forums
Clearly I can not have rolled 42 here.
Posted By: neilkaz In Response To: Neil Kazaross - Alfred Mamlet Carolina Inv. (Dmitriy Obukhov)
Date: Wednesday, 25 September 2013, at 4:02 a.m.
And yes the dice on the video clearly show me rolling 51 as I recalled when I saw the position!
Of course I cannot have played a 42 this way. While I thank William for transcribing, I STRONGLY urge all who do transcribe to go over the match with XG before releasing it to the public.
Please fix the .txt and redo the XG analysis. I'll do XGR++ in a couple of days.
White is ALFRED MAMLET
score: 7
pip: 9711 point match pip: 114
score: 8
Blue is NEIL KAZAROSSXGID=-aBBBABB-A--A----bbccbB-b-:1:1:1:42:8:7:0:11:10 Blue to play 42
1. XG Roller+ 12/10 9/5 eq: +1.0062
Player:
Opponent:86.17% (G:14.18% B:0.61%)
13.83% (G:1.70% B:0.03%)2. XG Roller+ 12/6 eq: +0.1424 (-0.8638)
Player:
Opponent:56.64% (G:9.99% B:0.46%)
43.36% (G:11.71% B:0.25%)eXtreme Gammon Version: 2.10.192.pre-release, MET: Kazaross XG2
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.