|
BGonline.org Forums
Impossible Move in Connecticut
Posted By: Art Grater In Response To: Impossible Move in Connecticut (Taper_Mike)
Date: Thursday, 31 October 2013, at 6:00 p.m.
Mike, the point I bring up here isn't whether the player has any duties to his owners. I don't think he or she does. For example, if a Vegas player would rather play blackjack than continue in the tournament consolation, so be it.
My question is whether a winning Calcutta owner has a similar ethical obligation with respect to the owners of the loser. If the tournament winnings are considered legal but ill-gotten, then are the Calcutta winnings also ill-gotten?
|
BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.