The two respondents picked plays with zero- and two-inner board blots. As Robertie said (and I find the principal unconvincing), seek middling plays. The one-blot play is correct, though by a small margin. Can anyone provide a convincing explanation?
1. | Rollout1 | 6/5 6/4* | eq: +0.189 |
| Player: Opponent: | 61.74% (G:18.44% B:0.31%) 38.26% (G:11.53% B:0.75%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+0.181...+0.196) - [100.0%] Duration: 21 minutes 09 seconds |
|
2. | Rollout1 | 12/10 5/4* | eq: +0.164 (-0.025) |
| Player: Opponent: | 60.44% (G:20.54% B:0.20%) 39.56% (G:11.59% B:0.54%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+0.156...+0.171) - [0.0%] Duration: 24 minutes 16 seconds |
|
3. | Rollout1 | 13/10 | eq: +0.153 (-0.035) |
| Player: Opponent: | 59.95% (G:14.42% B:0.18%) 40.05% (G:5.62% B:0.31%) | Conf.: ± 0.006 (+0.147...+0.160) - [0.0%] Duration: 20 minutes 10 seconds |
|
4. | Rollout1 | 13/12 6/4* | eq: +0.153 (-0.036) |
| Player: Opponent: | 60.17% (G:20.50% B:0.23%) 39.83% (G:12.67% B:0.55%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+0.145...+0.161) - [0.0%] Duration: 21 minutes 08 seconds |
|
5. | Rollout1 | 13/11 5/4* | eq: +0.133 (-0.056) |
| Player: Opponent: | 59.86% (G:21.72% B:0.23%) 40.14% (G:16.10% B:0.92%) | Conf.: ± 0.008 (+0.125...+0.141) - [0.0%] Duration: 22 minutes 40 seconds |
|
|
1 1296 Games rolled with Variance Reduction. Moves: 3-ply, cube decisions: XG Roller
|