[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums

Then why 1500?

Posted By: Rod
Date: Saturday, 30 November 2013, at 6:10 p.m.

In Response To: Proposed Ranking System -Update (Bob koca)

I checked the formula for elo and what you say is correct (I had assumed incorrectly previously)...

So why start backgammon ratings at 1500? Just because that's what chess did?

For chess, where someone might be more than 2000 better than someone else, sure. But in backgammon where there isn't going to be a 2000 point difference, a starting point of 1000 would be nicer, as in the referenced ELO rating system.

Messages In This Thread

 

Post Response

Your Name:
Your E-Mail Address:
Subject:
Message:

If necessary, enter your password below:

Password:

 

 

[ View Thread ] [ Post Response ] [ Return to Index ] [ Read Prev Msg ] [ Read Next Msg ]

BGonline.org Forums is maintained by Stick with WebBBS 5.12.